<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pixel Pushing Monkey &#187; videos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/tag/videos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog</link>
	<description>random ramblings of a designer in the valley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:36:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Purple Violets is a good movie</title>
		<link>http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/12/08/purple-violets-is-a-good-movie/</link>
		<comments>http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/12/08/purple-violets-is-a-good-movie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 22:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tidbits of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/12/08/purple-violets-is-a-good-movie/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spent the past week thinking of a clever title for this post, to my failure and disdain, that which you see (yeah, up there, look up) is the best I can come up with. As a bit of background, &#8230; <a href="http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/12/08/purple-violets-is-a-good-movie/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent the past week thinking of a clever title for this post, to my failure and disdain, that which you see (yeah, up there, look up) is the best I can come up with.</p>
<p>As a bit of background, <em>Purple Violets</em> gained a bit of attention as the first movie directly released to iTunes as an exclusive before it is available either as a direct-to-video release via DVD/VHS/rental or in the theaters. This move generated a bit of media coverage which probably would&#8217;ve never occured via any other channels, and the film would likely have died an obscure death, or relegated to the bargin bin in Best Buy.</p>
<p>However, <em>Purple Violets&#8217;</em> release is not just a play on generating media hype. The nature of the film itself is almost exactly the opposite of that. I am reminded of a few years ago, when horror movie genre was gathering steam yet again, and there were a lot of hype generated around some horror film fest (something akin to the 4 horror films you&#8217;ll never see, major studio will never release, or one of those all-weekend horror film b-flick marathons&#8230; or something); and the films all turned out to be forgettable, mediocre waste-of-my-time-and-intellect (what little is left of that last part).</p>
<p><em>Purple Violet</em> is *not* one of those films that would&#8217;ve been dependent on media hype to just be seen. It is a very frank, straight forward and non-assuming film about relationships and human interaction. It doesn&#8217;t provoke any new revelations or truth about human nature, it doesn&#8217;t have any real controversies to induce emotional conflicts from its audience. Most of all, it does not attempt to make you cry and weep to prove that it is in fact, a very romantic &amp; emotionally engaging film.</p>
<p>To put it blandly, this film is simply about people who had made mistakes in their lives, especially in regards to their choice in relationships; and how they were given another chance to rediscover what they might have been, and what they have lost. The dialogs aren&#8217;t dressed up with unnecessary complexity, they&#8217;re delivered naturally without pretense. Part of that I attribute to the script (written by Edward Burns, who is also the director), and a part of which I attribute to the wonderful casting (Selma Blair&#8217;s best work). The story itself is refreshingly linear, you always know where the movie is going, and it never once pretends that it&#8217;s going to veer away from that path.</p>
<p>This movie reminds me of <em>Next Stop, Wonderland</em>, which is another romantic film that delivers its content without dressing. Due to the likable characters and the tenderness of its plot, you can&#8217;t help but fall in love with the characters in the film. <em>Purple Violets</em> reminds me of how good a film can be, without trying to be anything that it&#8217;s not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/12/08/purple-violets-is-a-good-movie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PC = Steve Jobs?!</title>
		<link>http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/06/12/pc-steve-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/06/12/pc-steve-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Gone Wild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/06/12/pc-steve-jobs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the video clip from WWDC, so hilarious~ [There is a video that cannot be displayed in this feed. Visit the blog entry to see the video.] Enjoy!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the video clip from WWDC, so hilarious~</p>
<p>[There is a video that cannot be displayed in this feed. <a href="http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/06/12/pc-steve-jobs/">Visit the blog entry to see the video.]</a></p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/06/12/pc-steve-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft introduces: Ofone!</title>
		<link>http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/05/16/microsoft-introduces-ofone/</link>
		<comments>http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/05/16/microsoft-introduces-ofone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 23:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Gone Wild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/05/16/microsoft-introduces-ofone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s rare that Microsoft comes up with something truly funny, but this parody is really, actually, LOL-kinda good. Which makes you wonder, if they had this much time to make this parody&#8230; where is the ZunePhone?! [There is a video &#8230; <a href="http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/05/16/microsoft-introduces-ofone/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s rare that Microsoft comes up with something truly funny, but this parody is really, actually, LOL-kinda good. Which makes you wonder, if they had this much time to make this parody&#8230; where is the ZunePhone?!</p>
<p>[There is a video that cannot be displayed in this feed. <a href="http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/05/16/microsoft-introduces-ofone/">Visit the blog entry to see the video.]</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/05/16/microsoft-introduces-ofone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So.. this is what Viacom had up their sleeves</title>
		<link>http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/02/20/so-this-is-what-viacom-had-up-their-sleeves/</link>
		<comments>http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/02/20/so-this-is-what-viacom-had-up-their-sleeves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Gone Wild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/02/20/so-this-is-what-viacom-had-up-their-sleeves/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This will raise an interesting &#8220;war&#8221; of sorts on very different competing platforms. Youtube is all about ease of use and wide-spread adoption, while Joost is pushing the technology envelope to deliver HD-quality content over P2P. If Viacom&#8217;s experiment pays &#8230; <a href="http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/02/20/so-this-is-what-viacom-had-up-their-sleeves/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will raise an interesting &#8220;war&#8221; of sorts on very different competing platforms. Youtube is all about ease of use and wide-spread adoption, while Joost is pushing the technology envelope to deliver HD-quality content over P2P. If Viacom&#8217;s experiment pays off, it could easily spurn more companies to pull their support for Youtube and migrate. We&#8217;ll see&#8230; we&#8217;ll see&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/20/viacom-to-sign-deal-with-joost/">Viacom to Sign Deal with Joost (via Techcrunch)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pixelpushingmonkey.com/blog/2007/02/20/so-this-is-what-viacom-had-up-their-sleeves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
