Another unlikely teenage/college shooting happened today, apparently the argument was over a stolen Playstation. Jonquel Brooks, a 19-year-old freshman at Fresno State was accused of stealing a Playstation by three other guys; when he was confronted by the three man, he choose to shoot them instead of… well, there are a variety of other options, none of which was taken.
What I find really disturbing, especially so soon after the Virginia Tech incident, is that at some point the media will focus their attention at the video game console that is in the center of this event. Just as some people tried to link the VT incident with video games as well, although later proven to be completely irrational. There will always be a part of media, and people, that like to sensationalize violence and associate it with new trends in society that they can’t fully accept. For the last generation, movies, music, television were their scape goats. For our generation, it’s video games.
Why do I find that disturbing? It’s not because I had a particular affinity towards protecting criticisms towards video games. I’m for the most part, completely indifferent about how other people feel about my video game hobby. This incident is disturbing to me, because despite repetitious display of outrageous public, violent act performed by troubled teens, the “tool” at which they use to their means continues to be ignored as one of the factor & culprit of these incidents. We focus on “what went wrong with this kid” and “who do we blame for what happened here”, rather than pointing our fingers towards a much more direct question, “Why does a teenager have a gun?”
United States, by my recollection, is the only so-called civilized country that allows its citizen to acquire firearms with ease. Private ownership of lethal firearms is outlawed in almost all other first-world country. Americans as a whole continues to ignore the role that firearm plays into these violent crimes.
I have handled shotguns, went to shooting club with my uncle, took target practice in the past. What surprises me is how easy it was to disassociate a extremely lethal weapon to the potential harm it could do if not used properly. Yes, stabbing a person with a knife is a violent, and potentially lethal act; but there is something strange about using a gun that disassociate at least part of the visceral impact, and the moral ramifications of what you’re about to do, to actually doing it. I think of it like fighter jet pilots in a war, where they bomb targets by following instrumentations. It’s like playing, *gasp*, a video game, where the act of what they do and the ramifications of what they’ve done is almost completely disassociated with the actions they are taking.
I just think, that there’s a very huge difference between being able to shoot, versus trying to kill another human being without the help and the instantaneousness of a firearm. If we didn’t have firearms commonly distributed to private citizens here in United States, a lot of these violent crimes would’ve happened on a much smaller scale, perhaps not even occured at all. Columbine does *not* happen if those kids only had knifes and bats. Sure, some kids might be hurt or killed, but it would not be as massively terrifying as it was. Virigina Tech does *NOT* happen without a gun.
So why are the media so obsessed with scapegoating video games, movies, television?
